Department Agricultural Economics And Extension
Permanent URI for this community
Browse
Browsing Department Agricultural Economics And Extension by Subject "Consumption Preference, Fish, Households"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access FISH CONSUMPTION PREFERENCE AMONG RESIDENTS OF HADEJIA METROPOLIS, JIGAWA STATE, NIGERIA(Departmentof of Agricultural Science, 2016-02-06) S, Idris; I.j, Ochokuwu; M.A, DanbattaThis study was conducted to examine the consumption preference of six different fish types in Hadejia metropolis using a total of one hundred and twenty (120) structured questionnaires. The questionnaires covered information on demographic data of the respondents, rate of fish consumption and type of fish consumed between August and November 2015. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The result showed that respondents whose ages fall between (26 – 35years) had the highest representation 36 respondents (30%), majority of the consumers are married 78 respondents (65%) and 38 respondents (31.67%) had tertiary education, the respondents responded positively to fish consumption. 111 respondents (92%) consume fish while 56 respondents (46.7%) mode of consumption were weekly. However 60 respondents (50%) preferred to consume Tilapia monadi and Clarias sp, while 35 respondents (29.17%) consume Tilapia sp only. 6 respondents (5%), preferred Distichodus brevipinnus and Bagrus bayad. In addition 4 respondents (3.33%) favored Bagrus bayad only while 3 respondents (2.5%) Hydrocynus brevis. Few respondents choose two species, Bagrus bayad and Gymnarchus niloticus, Tilapia monadi and Labeo coubie with 2 (1.67%) and 2 (1.67%) respectively. Respondents with single fish species preferences at 1(0.83%) rate respectively include Clarias gariepinus, Labeo coubie, Mormyrus rume, Hydrocynus brevis and Bagrus bayad. The study revealed the availability of different fish species. Cost of the fish, freshness, method of processing and taste of the fish affects consumer preference, inclusive constrains to fish demands and low level of consumer income, inadequate fish markets and poor availability of fish farmers.